Recommendations for Sanitization Technologies

Hello All! I hope you might be able to help me out.

I have a customer who was asking for recommendations for "Sanitization Technologies." That is all the information I received, and if you would be so kind as to tell me about your favorites and recommendations, I would love to pass your advice on.

The customer is EcoGreenHotel.com, and the sanitizers would be for use strictly on commercial swimming pools.

I look forward to hearing your suggestions!

Monique Nelson
Flexible Solutions

You need to be a member of Pool Genius Network to add comments!

Join Pool Genius Network

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Hi Chuck, Exactly.

    The lowering of the actual pH would drive the ORP reading up even though the Chlorine would be getting used up. Therefore the controller would not get an accurate interpretation of the chlorine and might think there is more in the water than there actually is and not feed.

    Typical in controllers and I love them in spite of this. If it did feed then the chlorine would then contribute even more to the pH drop our rugby players are causing. Although the acid would be feeding it might not keep up with the demand from both players and chlorine and could get worse. In this case the acid continues to feed and will knock down the Alkalinity much more than it has to. Such is the need for proper sizing and proportional control.

    The flip side I find is people adjusting the Alkalinity too much at once with the controllers still online. pH rises too much which drops the ORP reading. So you have chlorine feeding when its not needed and acid feeding to beat the band again trying to compensate for both the Alkalinity and the extra chlorine. The famous spin cycle that will drive many nuts.

    Thanks and I will no doubt drop you a private message soon.
  • Rick,

    In your scenario above, the chlorine demand created by the rugby team would result in repeated feed cycles which would not only drive up the orp, but would also counter any temporary decrease in pH. Our controller is capable of feeding acid and chlorine at the same time which prevent the seesaw effect that can occur in your scenario. I'd be happy to answer any other questions you might have about our products at your convenience.
  • Rick,
    I'm a big IPS fan. The 2nd ORP outlet is all about options. It allows you to use a salt generator as your primary, and if it gets overwhelmed, the liquid chlorine pump will kick in.

    If you use a really big ozone system as your primary, the 2nd ORP can be connected to a chlorine system for back up & algae control & the ozone can be controlled by ORP 1 to keep from over generating ozone.

    I have compared prices on systems and I don;t think you pay a premium for the 2nd ORP feature. Just because it's there doesn't mean you have to use it,

    As far as a "false" ORP reading, I'm not sure what you mean. ORP is the measurement of the actual sanitizer activity in the water. When pH goes down, ORP goes up, the chlorine, ozone, or bromine is more active, thus a higher ORP reading. If the sanitizer is ACTUALLY depleted, the ORP will drop & the primary sanitizer supply will be activated by the system.

    I don't consider any system that reads ORP & pH & dispenses chemicals accordingly to be "dumb". A peristaltic pump or salt generator that operates on a timer or output percentage is "dumb" because it only does what the timer tells it to do, it doesn't respond to real time water conditions. But sense & dispense systems vary wildly in cost, reliability, ease of use, & maintenance requirements.





    Rick Larson said:
    I just looked at the IPS and while it seems a good system, I have to wonder why 2 ORP outputs. I understand the reasoning but if any other ORP controller is sized properly it will keep up with demand. I have used redundant controllers where 1 was set at .5ppm for normal use with Ozone. If the Ozone system failed for some reason the second controller kicks in at 1.5ppm.

    I like to use Rola-Chem controllers as a low cost alternative and find they work well, not "dumb" at all. They lack a few good points such as data recording and communication options but they are often not really required. Some controllers have the ability to give me a wake up call in the morning and turn on my coffee. Thats often not in the specs either.

    Back to 2 x ORP outputs. Scenario is a small body of water, possibly a Hot Tub. The local Rugby teams finishes a game a jumps in. Of course the Chlorine disappears and the chemical system needs to make it up fast. Either a well sized system or a dual ORP system can by kicking in a second pump and/or tank? Seems a bit costly to have redundant pumps etc?

    Bigger problem might be the Acid from the teams bodies will drop the pH. On a controller this will have the effect of falsely driving up the ORP reading. The controller may think there is no extra demand at all! You can get a very expensive controller to measure both free and total Chlorine and then Super-chlorinate or Shock, but realistically you can't do that with bathers in the water.

    Not knocking the IPS controllers, they look nice. I just don't see how they are "smart" and Rola-Chem or others would be "dumb".
  • I just looked at the IPS and while it seems a good system, I have to wonder why 2 ORP outputs. I understand the reasoning but if any other ORP controller is sized properly it will keep up with demand. I have used redundant controllers where 1 was set at .5ppm for normal use with Ozone. If the Ozone system failed for some reason the second controller kicks in at 1.5ppm.

    I like to use Rola-Chem controllers as a low cost alternative and find they work well, not "dumb" at all. They lack a few good points such as data recording and communication options but they are often not really required. Some controllers have the ability to give me a wake up call in the morning and turn on my coffee. Thats often not in the specs either.

    Back to 2 x ORP outputs. Scenario is a small body of water, possibly a Hot Tub. The local Rugby teams finishes a game a jumps in. Of course the Chlorine disappears and the chemical system needs to make it up fast. Either a well sized system or a dual ORP system can by kicking in a second pump and/or tank? Seems a bit costly to have redundant pumps etc?

    Bigger problem might be the Acid from the teams bodies will drop the pH. On a controller this will have the effect of falsely driving up the ORP reading. The controller may think there is no extra demand at all! You can get a very expensive controller to measure both free and total Chlorine and then Super-chlorinate or Shock, but realistically you can't do that with bathers in the water.

    Not knocking the IPS controllers, they look nice. I just don't see how they are "smart" and Rola-Chem or others would be "dumb".
  • Sorry Luke...

    I just saw your question!

    Chuck, the owner is a great source of info, and the system is well priced compared to the competition.

    The setup is a breeze, and overall the system seems to be pretty stable.

    For a little more than the price of SWG (about $650 more) you can have a full pH/ORP system which fully automates all the clients chemical feeding needs.

    We are installing another one on an all glass tile spa this week. We are using small 3 gallon chem tanks, which don't take up much room at the equipment pad...

    It is a way to really offer the client perfect water all the time. With most other chem feed systems ( stand alone Roll A Chem; SWG; Tab feeder) you have a "dumb" system which must be constantly adjusted based on the anticipated bather load; weather; water temp.......... But with the IPS system it maintains a consistent ORP level in the pool, and adjusts the amount of chemicals fed to match the actual needs of the water.
  • I have had great success with using corona discharge ozone systems as my primary sanitizer (I prefer Clear Water Tech), with a contact tank & ozone destruction unit to eliminate the fumes. Along with an ISP ORP/pH control to maintain pH & supply chlorine as needed. (Most health departments look for 1ppm.) Properly installed, the guests will never know there is chlorine in the pool, There is a fair amount of equipment maintenance involved, you need to watch your total alkalinity, but it will be perfect water to swim in regardless of bather load. Ozone is the best at killing e-coli, crypto & other bugs, it is a microflocculant so it helps control TDS, and it greatly reduces the amount of chlorine you'll need to pump into the pool.
  • From a business standpoint and to get return sales I would put the consumer on an accu-tab system. This locks the pool into only using Accu-tab branded chemicals (which you would supply). Using any other system would void the warranty on the system and fail inspection. I usually give the feeder to the account, and have them sign a five year contract to buy the chemicals from me. This also helps compete against the companies whom are selling liquid feed systems with contracts.

    As far as the going green aspect, reduce the chlorine usage with an ionizer or ozone.
  • Thanks, Rick. Good stuff!
  • Heres an internal link to something with more info.

    http://www.poolgeniusnetwork.com/forum/topics/anyone-talking-uv?com...
  • We run our R/O pump at around 200 psi. I'll let you decide if that is low or high pressure!
This reply was deleted.